Comments on: Join our video chat today

By: Rob M

Rob M — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:03:31 +0000

MW edmonton would not even give us cogliano straight up for zherdev, the kid is 3 years younger than zherdev and has a sick amount of potential

By: Rick Carpiniello

Rick Carpiniello — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:40:23 +0000

Mikey, I appreciate you having my back, but you have to keep it a little cleaner, bro.

By: Rick Carpiniello

Rick Carpiniello — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:39:13 +0000

No, we’re not banning Stu. Every blog has to have a jackass.

Hey, Stu, nobody’s holding you here. You can go. The Boneheads will be happy to show you the exit.

By: No Country For Old Rangers

No Country For Old Rangers — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:27:57 +0000

Disco Stu is a Disco Dick

By: MW

MW — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:14:28 +0000

This has gotta be a sign Zherdev is trade bait. At #3 mill per year for Kotalik the Rangers would be strapped for cash if they keep Zherdev. If Edmonton is interested, as rumored, I say Zherdev for Andrew Cogliano and Rob Schremp.

By: Doodie Machetto

Doodie Machetto — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:07:39 +0000

Adam, yes, it’s an improvement, but I think that looking at things that way ignores mistakes that could have been avoided, i.e., the potentially disastrous Kotalik contract.

Also, if you look at our centers

Gomez, Drury, Dubinsky, Betts

Drury, Dubinsky, Anisimov, Boyle

I think that’s definitely a step down in quality.

By: Fly Line

Fly Line — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:07:18 +0000

from your lips to God’s ears Adam-

By: Laurel Babcock

Laurel Babcock — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:05:04 +0000

new post

By: Adam Z.

Adam Z. — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:05:00 +0000

Fly, I put Cally first for institutional loyalty. Besides, maybe he’ll pot 40 next year :)

By: Rob F

Rob F — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:02:36 +0000

there is still a lot of confusion out there

is it 3 years at 3 mill per?
or 3 years at 1 mill per?

i would HAVE to assume the former.