<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated: Voros, Gomez and Naslund</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/</link>
	<description>News and insight about the New York Rangers by Rick Carpiniello</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LI Joe</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/#comment-133760</link>
		<dc:creator>LI Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2737#comment-133760</guid>
		<description>dm 11:31

well said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dm 11:31</p>
<p>well said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LI Joe</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/#comment-133758</link>
		<dc:creator>LI Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2737#comment-133758</guid>
		<description>zherv  11:27  

buyout for avery would be over 6 yrs not 8 since he would have 3 yrs left. and take the $2 mm + figure you used and divide by 2. really is 1/3 of yrly salary over twice the remaining yrs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zherv  11:27  </p>
<p>buyout for avery would be over 6 yrs not 8 since he would have 3 yrs left. and take the $2 mm + figure you used and divide by 2. really is 1/3 of yrly salary over twice the remaining yrs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LI Joe</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/#comment-133756</link>
		<dc:creator>LI Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2737#comment-133756</guid>
		<description>zherv 11:22   not really a good idea to compare dmen with forwards on points. apples and oranges</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zherv 11:22   not really a good idea to compare dmen with forwards on points. apples and oranges</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LI Joe</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/#comment-133734</link>
		<dc:creator>LI Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2737#comment-133734</guid>
		<description>zherv - 9:27  waiver order is by reverse standings calculated by % of pts avail. in other words if flyers have 1 pt less than us but 2 games in hand we would be considered below them in the standings and would be able to claim a player before them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zherv &#8211; 9:27  waiver order is by reverse standings calculated by % of pts avail. in other words if flyers have 1 pt less than us but 2 games in hand we would be considered below them in the standings and would be able to claim a player before them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LI Joe</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/#comment-133730</link>
		<dc:creator>LI Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2737#comment-133730</guid>
		<description>only a fool would bring avery back. oh that&#039;s right we have sather so it wuld be a slam dunk. have his antics for next 3 yrs that&#039;s just beautiful.

brandon 9:20   - i would take dubinsky off the important players list too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only a fool would bring avery back. oh that&#8217;s right we have sather so it wuld be a slam dunk. have his antics for next 3 yrs that&#8217;s just beautiful.</p>
<p>brandon 9:20   &#8211; i would take dubinsky off the important players list too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/#comment-133684</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2737#comment-133684</guid>
		<description>guys, I wasn&#039;t saying Ward is a great Dman. I was answering doodie&#039;s post that claimed that Ward leaving was the reason for the Ranger surge, not Avery arriving.

I was seconding True Fans contention that it was Avery arriving in Feb 2 yrs ago that was the reason for the surge.

and here is the proof from Brooks column.

he Rangers were 50-23-13 with him in the lineup, 24-35-9 without him in the lineup from the beginning of 2006-07 through the end of his tenure.

that says it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guys, I wasn&#8217;t saying Ward is a great Dman. I was answering doodie&#8217;s post that claimed that Ward leaving was the reason for the Ranger surge, not Avery arriving.</p>
<p>I was seconding True Fans contention that it was Avery arriving in Feb 2 yrs ago that was the reason for the surge.</p>
<p>and here is the proof from Brooks column.</p>
<p>he Rangers were 50-23-13 with him in the lineup, 24-35-9 without him in the lineup from the beginning of 2006-07 through the end of his tenure.</p>
<p>that says it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doodie machetto</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/#comment-133664</link>
		<dc:creator>doodie machetto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2737#comment-133664</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dallas isnt going to take 2, 3, or 4 players from us. They are playing well lately. They are making a playoff push with the guys they have. The last time they brought new blood to the locker room it was a terrible experience. I expect Dallas to be EXTREMELY hesitant to make any NHL-level changes to their team until the offseason.&quot;

Morrow is out for a while, Zubov is gone for the season. Richards actually really helped the team down the stretch and into the playoffs last season. Almost a ppg clip for both. 

So we&#039;re giving them two roster players, two prospects and a pick for Lehtinen who is UFA at season&#039;s end. Toss in Callahan if they want a good two-way player to replace him. Also throw in a conditional 2nd rounder if he resigns with us (which if I were in charge, and unfortunately I never will be, he wouldn&#039;t).

Personally, I think for us, all of that is worth it just to be rid of Avery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dallas isnt going to take 2, 3, or 4 players from us. They are playing well lately. They are making a playoff push with the guys they have. The last time they brought new blood to the locker room it was a terrible experience. I expect Dallas to be EXTREMELY hesitant to make any NHL-level changes to their team until the offseason.&#8221;</p>
<p>Morrow is out for a while, Zubov is gone for the season. Richards actually really helped the team down the stretch and into the playoffs last season. Almost a ppg clip for both. </p>
<p>So we&#8217;re giving them two roster players, two prospects and a pick for Lehtinen who is UFA at season&#8217;s end. Toss in Callahan if they want a good two-way player to replace him. Also throw in a conditional 2nd rounder if he resigns with us (which if I were in charge, and unfortunately I never will be, he wouldn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>Personally, I think for us, all of that is worth it just to be rid of Avery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAKO</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/#comment-133659</link>
		<dc:creator>MAKO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2737#comment-133659</guid>
		<description>Chris

Why are you inserting players who dont play center at center? LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris</p>
<p>Why are you inserting players who dont play center at center? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gargoyle</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/#comment-133658</link>
		<dc:creator>Gargoyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2737#comment-133658</guid>
		<description>So the circus is coming to the Garden early this year i see.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the circus is coming to the Garden early this year i see&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffluke</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2009/02/05/voros-gomez-and-naslund/#comment-133657</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffluke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2737#comment-133657</guid>
		<description>new post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

