lohud.com

Sponsored by:

Rangers Report

News and insight about the New York Rangers

OK, let’s vote on Tom Renney

January
31

So, since you guys have been doing it for months, if not years, let’s talk about Tom Renney.


FIRST I’d like to get an idea of what I’m up against here. Do you think it would be possible for you guys to SIMPLY give me a YES or NO response – no arguments, no trash talk, just a YES or a NO on the following?:


Do you think this is all Renney’s fault?


If you say YES, then I trust you are saying you think the team is better than its record indicates and he should be fired.


If you say NO, then I will take that as any number of things, such as it’s partly his fault, or it’s not his fault, or his hand are tied by the players he has, or he could do better but he’s not bad, etc.


Once I count up the YES and NO votes tomorrow morning, we’ll try to have a discussion on the coach, the GM, the players, etc., but focusing on Renney.


So PLEASE starting now, just YES or NO.


YES OR NO.


OK?

This entry was posted on Saturday, January 31st, 2009 at 9:15 pm by Carp.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Print Print | Email Email

Advertisement

272 Responses to “OK, let’s vote on Tom Renney”

  1. John M

    YES

  2. Jo Mama

    YES, it is all Renney’s fault

  3. Chris

    No!

  4. Rick Carpiniello

    I knew we couldn’t do it.

    One word. YES or NO.

  5. lennynyr

    YES

  6. Rob L.

    NO

  7. MikeA

    No-This is Sather’s fault. He signed Redden and Kalinin when he could have had any 2 combos of Jason Smith/Ossi Vannanen/Mike Commodore/Ron Hainsey/Mark Streit making about $7.5-$8 million.

    Renney needs to be more aggressive and I don’t know if he is the guy to bring a championship to NY, but he’s done a great job of getting this franchise back on track and I’m not ready to dump him yet.

    This is a transition year all. If they make the playoffs, it’s a success. If they win a round, a huge success. If they go 1986 Le Miracle Petite (I was all of 5 years old when Larouche coined the term) on us; that would be the best case scenario.

  8. Lev

    No

  9. rangerny09

    No

  10. Olga

    NO

  11. MikeA

    Sorry Carp, I can’t follow directions it seems :( You think I would’ve gotten something out of college other than getting really good at NHL 2002.

  12. Mike Lau

    no

  13. Gamma82

    NO

  14. Rick Carpiniello

    No problem, Mike. We’re going to go at this better once we get a lot of votes in. You might guess, too, that Sather will be a big part of the discussion.

    but for now … YES OR NO!

  15. Will

    Yes.

  16. Joe

    No

  17. af

    no

  18. Rob L.

    Add Sathers name to the question and all these no’s become Yes.

  19. Rob L.

    being that I already answered I thought I’d chime in with a comment, sorry Carp.

  20. KiloVIctor

    no

  21. LI Joe

    NO

    33% renney
    33% sather
    33% dolan
    1% bob

  22. bklynblue

    yes

  23. Rick Carpiniello

    we will get to Sather later. For now, on Renney …

    YES OR NO!

  24. dg

    YES.
    ——————————-

    Renney’s hang-back system is a major factor

  25. Chris G

    no

  26. Shawn

    No

  27. somerset

    no

  28. Jay

    No

  29. LI Joe

    carp – any one who says no will be hung in effigy by the anti renney people. i value my life.

    it is an unfair question. like do you still beat your wife. how can you answer this. either way you’re wrong.

  30. wd40

    YES

  31. dg

    yes, I still beat my wife. at golf.

  32. danizme

    NO

  33. WheresPruuuu?

    No!

  34. Matt

    Yes

  35. PJH

    No

  36. bull dog line

    carp,
    i think its colin campbell fault.
    yes on renney.

  37. ford

    Yes!

  38. Kirk

    No!

  39. wd40sucks SUCKS

    DUH??? (Yes)

  40. bklynblue

    yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

  41. Dan

    No.

  42. Ricky Ricardo

    Si.

  43. wd40

    Man, a lot of these No votes are from people I have never heard of. Ballot box stuffing???

  44. MAKO

    Yes.

    WD Im glad you said it. i didnt want carp yelling at me LOL

  45. Josh Thomson

    I do not exist. But if I did?

    YES!

  46. Bryan

    YES

  47. Stuart

    NO..

    NO..

    NO

  48. Eric

    no no no.

  49. Kate

    No.

  50. wd40

    Right, Kate. Sure. Yeah. Your name is really Kate. Kate Hepburn. You were great in ‘Golden Pond.’

  51. Harsh

    YES

  52. Beer Me!

    YES

  53. Evereux

    An emphatic no.

  54. Moe Larry Curly Shemp & Joe Besser

    Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes!

  55. Moe Larry Curly Shemp & Joe Besser

    Ooops. Forgot the last YES.

  56. Perry Pearn

    YES

  57. nakedjoe

    no

  58. Salty

    YES

    Don’t read this part
    Not just the system, but he can’t motivate a team. I can’t wait to get into this. Again. With Carp. Who is not afraid to take a side from time to time.

  59. Missing Sam

    I miss Sam.

  60. Rob L.

    and now an imposter Beer Me! sighting at 9:56

  61. blade

    No.

  62. nyr13

    no

  63. Mike

    NO

  64. bklynblue

    YES TO SATHER TOO!

  65. Voice of Reason

    Oh Yeah…yes

    Poor line combinations, poor special teams

  66. RennyKilledPrucha

    YES

  67. boxcareddiehospodar

    Yes

  68. Nasty 1

    No

    And my friend Carl is here, I call him Slingblade, and his answer is Mmmm hmmm. Then he mumbled something about french fried tatters.

  69. fungi

    NO

  70. andy

    yes

  71. Inferno

    Yes.

    Absolutely Yes.

    150% YES!!!!!!!!!!1

  72. Nelson

    Hell

    YES

  73. NYR Blogger

    No

  74. John T

    NO

  75. Borman

    Absolutely NO!

  76. Greg

    no

  77. FairGame

    No, not even close.

  78. Hanna

    YES

  79. wd40

    Fair Game, yeah right, not even close, we got Scotty Bowman behind the bench. What a fool

  80. lennynyr

    make that a YES for Li Joe

  81. onecupin67years

    Yes

  82. Messier11

    Yes

  83. RetireBradPark's#2

    No

  84. meg

    No.

  85. Jeff

    NO. This is Sather’s fault.

  86. Kim

    No

  87. Rich

    yes…and not just for this season, look at the track record…

    – Renney’s stubbornness in insisting that Weekes was the #1 goalie when Lundqvist was clearly outplaying him during the first few months of ‘05-’06
    – watching the team collapse down the stretch after the Olympics, not even able to get that 1 point needed to clinch the division at the end of the season
    – playing Jagr on the PK (which he hadn’t done all year!) in the closing minutes of a Game 1 blowout loss vs. New Jersey, we all know what happened next, series basically over
    – putting Jagr/Nylander on the ice while protecting a 1 goal lead in the final minute of Game 5 vs. Buffalo…Drury scores, series basically over
    – playing passive, “not-to-lose” hockey after going up 3-0 vs. Pittsburgh in Game 1 last year…Pittsburgh comes back to win, series basically over
    – after the Rangers erase a 2 goal deficit and come back to tie Game 3 vs. Pittsburgh, Renney puts that brain-dead idiot Hollweg on the ice, maybe for his “sandpaper”...Hollweg boarding penalty, series REALLY over
    – you can make the argument that Renney’s (bad) decisions were the turning points in all 3 playoff series losses since the lockout
    – Renney’s overall lack of accountability, and also his selective accountability favoring vets at the expense of younger players (see: Prucha, Petr)
    – his mindless line combos (like Betts centering Shanahan among many others) and lineup choices (the Krog/Isbister experiments, his mancrush on Hossa, playing Voros over Prucha for size and “sandpaper” when this team can’t score, etc.)
    – his inability to make in-game adjustments
    – Renney’s “system” and passive, conservative, “not-to-lose” style of play, which gets the least out of the talent available…his “system” has also made this Rangers team the most BORING, unwatchable NYR team in my lifetime

    sorry Carp I know you said “yes or no” but I needed to vent after today’s game…DO SATHER NEXT, he’s just as responsible

  88. HockeymanRangers

    Yes

  89. cup94

    no

  90. ORR..What Is It Good FOR ??

    YES !!

    I like long legs, and big boobs.

    Lets Go Isles !! No Tavares for YOU !!!

  91. TRC3640

    Yes.

  92. True Fans Bleed RW&B

    YES

  93. ORR..What Is It Good FOR ??

    RICH

    You’re right, im not that excited aboot Nyr hockey as i usually am, i used to want to take a nap in the p.m. so i can wake up at 7 right before the drop of the puck, now i just don’t care, and kinda take the hours of waiting as my “happy hours” cause i have a strange feeling when the next 3 hours are up, im gonna feel like putting someones face through a sheet of glass.

    This fuggin team frustrates me ! God damn Hulk syndrome is what i get out of it.

  94. True Fans Bleed RW&B

    Carp, don’t read this!

    Wow, Rich. That’s a really comprehensive list and everything is 100% accurate. Nice!!

  95. Beer Me!

    lenny no way – i voted 1/3 each renney sather and dolan who gets way too much a free pass around here. i bet at least 1/2 the yes votes would also vote yes for the exact same question just changing renney to sather. can’t since the way the question is posed as IS THIS ALL RENNEYS FAULT. operative word being ALL.

  96. LI Joe

    i guess i just gave away who was having fun with the beer me vote

  97. Jarret

    No

  98. Rich

    Orr-

    exactly, I’ve never been as distracted/disinterested watching a Rangers game as I have been this year (even during the late 90’s/early 2000’s dark years)

    it’s really hard to keep from flipping to other games on the Center Ice package…Caps/Red Wings today or watch us “play the system” while struggling to generate any real offense, easy choice

  99. blurt

    Yes

  100. bklynblue

    YES to what Rich said. That’s a lot of evidence , basically beyond a reasonable doubt since it’s been done 3 years in a row working on 4 . Guilty of overpremeditated murder of offense and the NYR.

  101. Rich

    True Fans Bleed RW&B-

    thanks man, our “effort” today inspired that

  102. Tom Foolery

    No but he should still be fired

  103. Tristateyankee

    YES

  104. LI Den

    No!

  105. Ryan

    No

  106. Craig

    Bored, but NO…..Just doing a good job playing cards he was dealt!!

  107. Steve

    No. It’s not all his fault, but he could be better.. however.. the team has been getting better every year.

  108. mr qc

    no

    firing renney would not make the rangers any better

  109. ORR..What Is It Good FOR ??

    I hate Renney with a passion. He just cant control this team, and im so sick of Renney lovers saying he “brought this team back to respectability”, yeah right, Hank, and Jagr saved Nyr in 05-06, and when they got injured during the end of the year, what happened ? They got swept. The great coach he is couldn’t get the message through to Nylander, Straka, Ruchinsky, Sykora, and the other Vets on this team, and they got bitched around by a team that wasn’t even as good as they looked in that series.

    He’s done some good thing’s, but not enough to come to the conclusion that he’s a good coach, and he’ll be the one to bring this team to the Cup finals. I just don’t see it, not with him as the coach, but hey, some people think otherwise, waddya gonna do.

  110. Rasputin

    YES

  111. Eric

    Yes

  112. evitageN

    sadly, yes

  113. Sore & True

    no

  114. t

    Yes (What Rich said)

  115. dr house

    NO

  116. KrispyNYR

    No

  117. Ely

    No

  118. Tsar

    Yes, bigtime.

  119. noah

    no

  120. noah

    actually i changed my mind. yes.

  121. aado

    no!

  122. Max

    YES

  123. Joe

    YES

  124. Joe

    Rick you are awesome! No other Rangers writer would have the guts to do a post like this…Thank You

  125. True Fans Bleed RW&B

    Slightly ammending my vote:
    Renney is the most significant problem with this team.

    There are other flaws, but they could be compensated for if Renney knew how to coach this team, had a better system, and implemented better pre-game (personel) and in-game judgement. The players, coach, and GM are also an embarrassment, but Renney should be able to make this a top-division team (as evidenced by their season’s start).

  126. Joey dag

    No.

  127. True Fans Bleed RW&B

    by “The coach…are also an embarassment” I meant Pearn and the PP.

  128. Peter

    Yes

  129. ORR'S Imaginary Friend With The Same Website !!!

    YES

  130. YESYESYESYES

    YES!

  131. ORR..What Is It Good FOR ??

    If we’re adding Pearn to that list, then YES as well.

  132. ORR..Right Hand + Renney's Jaw = Freedom !!

    Also, Slats. He’s gotta go, one way or the other.

  133. Scotty 2 Hotty

    yes

  134. Scotty Hockey

    I can’t believe I am writing this but:

    NO.

  135. Scotty 2 Hotty

    I love Renney as a coach but not the coach of the Rangers. His defense first thought process is lowing down what could be an amazingly fast high paced team that could score 4-5 goals a game. Renney would be better coaching a team without superstars.

  136. Brian

    No.

  137. DaveZula

    Yes

  138. Sect340

    No

  139. lennynyr

    Joe

    “Rick you are awesome! No other Rangers writer would have the guts to do a post like this…Thank You”

    It’s really Bob Page in disguise. :~)

  140. eugik

    No

  141. Greg Venuto

    No.

  142. mike d

    I don’t see how you can put this on Renney. He can only coach the team he has in front of him. How can any of us really think this was going to be anything other than a transition year? Losing Jagr/Shanny/Straka and fielding a team that could have not even one guy net 30. True, they tried to make a splash with Redden…but even that terrrible contract isn’t Renney’s fault. Anyone who thought during the summer that we were going to have an elite team this year was simply deluding themselves.

  143. Kaspar

    Yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

  144. Joseph

    NO

    Renney can’t make a goalscorer out of a non-goalscorer

  145. GB

    NO

  146. Jon S

    NO!

  147. James

    YES.

    ps- Great to have ya back talking Rangers Carp! Welcome aboard.

  148. Anthony

    Yes

    Too conservative of a system.

  149. brian

    Yes.. he says the same line after every loss and im sick of it.

    “Yea we lost but we can take a few positive elements out of this game and build on it”

    Thank you Rick for bringing this up.

    A good teacher doesn’t necessarily mean a good coach, they need someone with fire in them, renney makes a very good assistant but is not a good coach. By example if u want to go back to a few weeks ago (before the chicago game), and he made the quote, “maybe i should yell at refs more often it seems to work for other coaches.”

    I was dumbfounded wen i heard that quote. Did he finally realize that now?

    He’s got to go. Plain and simple

  150. nathan

    No.

  151. Zhervalev

    YES.

  152. Scuubs

    YES

  153. Seth

    No.

  154. Zhervalev

    I’ve never seen so many short handed goals, or bench minors, or line juggling, or failure to bench the real problems (our $7m men), so yes. Dump the entire staff.

  155. pemoco

    Yes.

    The coach is responsible for the team performing at a level less than the sum of its collective level of talent.

    Sather gets a yes too, because he tied up $25+ million/year in four players (Gomez, Drury, Redden, Rozsival)—but as you say, that is a different discussion.

    btw, welcome back Carpy…

  156. Joey #27

    yes

  157. wicky229

    NO

  158. Sam

    YES YES YES

  159. Sam

    He ruins scorers and is to defensive

  160. Salty

    I have to say, the way this question is posed is inherently bad either way IMO. It’s obviously not a black & white issue, why position it as such? and why not make an actual legit poll if you dont want people talking about it?

  161. toymaniam

    Rick, glad you have the guts to ask this question but the way you phrased it is not fair to many. “Is it ALL Renney’s fault, Yes or No, has many people saying No even if they want Renney fired. Just like a juror voting not guilty because there was not a 100% certainty even though he was mostly sure that guilty was the correct vote. I can very honestly say it is NOT ALL Renney’s fault but there are more than sufficient reasons that he be fired ASAP.
    Having said that, FIRE HIM NOW

  162. Aaron

    No.

  163. Eric

    No, I think he could do better with lines but Sather has to take blame.

  164. Arby

    Slats certainly hasn’t helped things, with his Summer of Cap Room Magic, but Renney and the coaches have to take the blame for a perennially woeful PP unit, and amateur line changes. Tom’s a nice man, a bit too Zen for my taste, but a nice man. He’s not the coach who’s going to take you to the Finals. And he’s certainly not going to even get you close.

    Not ALL his fault, but YES, Renney & Co. have to go.

  165. ORR's Right Hand + Renney's Jaw = Freedom !!

    That’s the problem right there, Renney’s too nice. He rarely gets fired up, and when he does, you cant take him serious. It’s like a Clown trying to act tough, it just doesn’t seem right.

    The way he treats his kids is pathetic. He benches them, or scratches them, but the Vets, if they make the same EXACT mistakes, or worse, they don’t miss a mother fuggin shift. How is that good coaching ?? Please Renney lovers, explain, cause id love to know.

  166. JayKnight

    No.

  167. tsalad

    Yes

  168. Chris

    No

  169. matts

    No!

  170. topcorner

    Yes

  171. NorthCountryRanger

    YES

  172. Kevin

    NO

    this is NOT tom renney’s fault. Every intelligent rangers fan would know this.. Tom is not the reason the team is not a stanley cup calibur team. Glen Sather is. EVERYONE can agree with me on that… He makes the wrong moves!

    why not go out and get a hossa? or a kovalchuk? the rangers need a player of the calibur of Ovechkin or parise.

    we dont have that.

    we have AVERAGE puck handlers (aside from gomez), and BELOW Average scorers.

    everone on the team plays the same way.

    dump nasulnd.. dump redden.

    clear the space.

    trade for ilya!.

    make some moves.. GOOD ONES.

    compliment the young guns like dubie and dawes.

    give gomez someone to give the puck to, someone who kNOWS what to do with it.

    the end.

  173. HockeyViper

    No. This should be on Sather and his signing of redundant parts like Drury/Gomez and Rozsival/Redden. Especially with Dubinsky/Anismov and Del Zotto/Sanguinetti most likely being able to play their positions by the time their contracts run out.

  174. Steve

    No.

  175. lotus

    NO holy crap. (but I’ll take any change at this point :P)

  176. RollmeaDubi

    NO
    Rick, Pose the same question about Sather tomorrow

  177. Mark P

    No.
    Renney is a great coach, even though I wish he’d play Prucha more.

    Sather: Yes.

  178. Septemous

    yes

  179. topcorner

    Kevin, sorry but I don’t agree. Too many times it has become obvious that the team’s tempo is being modulated. Notice how the back checking by the forwards is pretty well always decent, while so often the forecheck is throttled and almost non-existant. If the backchecking is good, it tells me the players are buying in to what Renney says. I’m not behind the bench obviously, but the way the forecheck pressure changes from game to game, and within a game, leaves me with the conclusion it is Renney’s ‘tuning’ and his idea of defense being the best policy. And I think he gets it really really wrong and short sells his players on what they actually could accomplish when they are not reined in so excessively. I’ve thought this for about two years now, would love to see a new coaching brigade.

  180. palookaville

    YES

  181. Reginald Dunlop

    NO

  182. Rucchin

    no

  183. ralph

    NO

  184. jeffluke

    yes (lower case to emphasize hesitation in the agreed one-word-answer format)

  185. Dave G

    NO!

    It’s Slats fault!!

  186. Tom

    No.

    Isn’t there a poll you can make on the right?

  187. rob Dukes

    no…

  188. ORR's Right Hand + Renney's Jaw = Freedom !!

    Ive never seen so many new people. This is a pretty hot topic i guess. I cant wait for the Slats one, probably Oilers fans will show up.

  189. Forechecker

    No.

  190. UKRanger

    No

  191. zach

    No.

  192. Donnie

    No (cautiously)

  193. jpg30

    NO

  194. Terry

    No. Sather needs to make a move…NOW!!! It’s getting late early…

  195. All Hail King Henrik

    YES and no

  196. DanTheRangerFan

    ITS A hard one but Id have to say…. NO

  197. Mustache John

    YES

  198. Janne

    Hell no!

  199. Newman

    YES!!!!!!!

  200. stopwiththefourthlinealready

    yes

  201. zherdevsgirl

    NO

  202. DanTheRangerFan

    If you voted twice under a different name you really need to get a life, this is suppose to be a fun poll..to get an idea of what readers think about Renney..then again why waste my breathe these trolls never get the point

  203. zherdevsgirl

    Oh look, the poll police is here. I personally did not vote twice under different names but I can’t hate on those that did.. some people are passionate about their opinions so just let it be. Like it makes a difference anyway!

  204. robix

    No. But Dolan is not gonna fire Sather, and this complacent bunch needs a tougher coach.

  205. Prospect Park

    Yes BUT WITH A DISCLAIMER

    Firing Renney solves nothing since he still has a lot to offer the Rangers. The reason why the Rangers have prospects coming up is because Tom Renney fixed the scouting and developmental program.

    Tom Renney as one of the VP for Hockey Canada is part of the reason why Canada has won 5 straight gold medals. Renney is no NHL coach but he is one heck of a desk jockey

    Move Renney behind a desk where he can do his best work.

    The Rangers need someone who will shove their foot up someone’s rear if they fail to give 100%, they need someone who will not stand there like a statue when the refs are giving them the shaft, the Rangers need someone who has won as a player and as a coach and they already employ that person.

    Give me Jim Schoenfeld as the next Ranger coach

  206. Alex T

    Yes. and no. (sigh)

  207. Staal=Norris

    YES

  208. theflynn

    No.

  209. Patrick Brennan

    YES

  210. Msmuds

    No

  211. Kurt

    YES and Please may I have another !!!!!!!!!!!!

  212. Kurt

    PS——Great picture of Renney,it looks like he`s hiding Pearns gerbil

  213. Pavelich82

    NO!

  214. Japa

    Yes.

  215. Clive Diggs

    No

  216. Tommy

    Yes

  217. Phil

    Yes.

    I used to be a “No” on this but now a “yes.” By no means all his fault. But this system is sucking the inspiration and natural talent out of the team.

  218. BobSantos

    Yes

  219. your boy Malik

    YES

  220. Keys86

    Y-E-S

  221. RangerFan

    No

    if anything he’s done a good job getting them this far with these garbage players

  222. True Fans Bleed RW&B

    “this is NOT tom renney’s fault. Every intelligent rangers fan would know this.. Tom is not the reason the team is not a stanley cup calibur team. Glen Sather is. EVERYONE can agree with me on that… He makes the wrong moves!”

    For reply, read Orr’s and Rich’s posts above. They’re two pretty intelligent guys, btw.

    As to the person who said Renney’s helped get 5 straight Canadian medals… ummm… isn’t that more because it’s Canada and they ummm… well … HAVE THE MOST PLAYERS IN THE NHL ANYWAY?! ummm? Right? haha.

  223. True Fans Bleed RW&B

    “RangerFan
    February 1st, 2009 at 9:06 am
    No

    if anything he’s done a good job getting them this far with these garbage players”

    Brain-washed! Stop watching MSG commercials and stop listening to Sam and Joe! Hell, even Weinman had disdain for Renney when he left the team and Sam was a pretty staunch supporter of Renney before this season.

  224. shesends

    YES. and to everyone saying no, two words for you: the powerplay. which apparently they don’t even practice. hrm..

    fire renney. bottom line is he doesn’t hold his players accountable.

  225. twin

    YES

  226. Dave

    No. This is still all on Sather.

  227. TheGill

    No, not a chance.

  228. Tucson Ken

    No

  229. Jonathan Probber

    No.

  230. RV

    NO

  231. Cynar

    yes

  232. Brian

    YES

  233. lennynyr

    Speaking of Sather, check this out. You might want to throw eggs and tomatoes at your computer.

    http://www.legendsofhockey.net:8080/LegendsOfHockey/jsp/LegendsMember.jsp?type=Builder&list=ByName&page=video&mem=b199701&bw=hi#photo

    Back to Renney voting. I already cast my YES vote.

  234. cwgatti

    NO way

  235. Dennis

    YES, not because of him winning or losing but because Tom Renney hockey is BORING hockey. At this point I’d rather watch the Washington Ovechkins or even the Bruins. At least they work hard, they hit hard, they score goals, they are fun to watch.

  236. Prucha25

    YES!!

    Renney has NO CLUE how to run a bench.

    Second

    Why is it that one of the players that actually plays with heart and understands the concept of forechecking SITS IN THE PRESSBOX most games?

    Sorry for the caps, but this man infuriates me.

    I hate Renney and think he sucks any offensive life this team has out of it.

  237. Dubi or not Dubi

    YES

  238. NYR LEE

    YES – It’s Torts time!

  239. Prucha25

    Orr’s right hand man (I think) said at 12:45am

    That’s the problem right there, Renney’s too nice. He rarely gets fired up, and when he does, you cant take him serious. It’s like a Clown trying to act tough, it just doesn’t seem right.

    <>

    Hits the nail on the head.

  240. Hospo

    NO.

    Very limited and redundant roster provided by Sather, but Renny hasn’ty gotten the best out of what he has since October…Can him..

  241. Prucha25

    Here’s the rest of Orr’s quote.

    “”The way he treats his kids is pathetic. He benches them, or scratches them, but the Vets, if they make the same EXACT mistakes, or worse, they don’t miss a mother fuggin shift. How is that good coaching ?? Please Renney lovers, explain, cause id love to know.””

  242. john

    YES ,TOO BAD NICE GUYS FINISH LAST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  243. mhurley

    No

  244. Bill

    NO, it’s SATHER!

  245. Bill

    No,it’s SATHER!

  246. hater depot

    No.

  247. blaze

    yes

  248. sesak

    Yes

  249. rocketnyr

    Yes, Yes, a thousand times Yes.

    Firing Renney, Pearn and Pelino and bringing in a tough knowledgeable coach (Tortorella, Laviolette) will fix most of what’s wrong with this team…

  250. BrooklynRangersFan

    YES.

  251. Old Fogey

    Yes.

  252. Mig

    No

  253. Riche'

    No

    not ALL

  254. Tom G

    No

  255. Lynnard

    Yes

  256. alex b (the poster formely known as czechthemout!!!!)

    1000% yesssssssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  257. PJ

    YES, renney needs to be put out to pasture to eat some grass.

  258. DavidC

    Yes….SET LINES!

  259. Jenna

    Yes!

  260. dg

    Moe Larry Curly Shemp & Joe Besser January 31st, 2009 at 9:57 pm

    Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes!
    —————————————-

    SOITENLY !!

  261. Ralph

    yes

  262. schlagel

    no

  263. prucha25

    YES. YES. YES.

  264. Chris in MA

    no, but hes part of the problem. sorry, i just had to clarify

  265. if the SJO fits

    YES! WE CAN!

  266. extremely anonymous

    No, not entirely

  267. Jim Napoltano

    NO!

  268. Fitz

    Yes

  269. Pierre

    No

  270. ENRAGED

    YYYYEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS

  271. The Dark Ranger

    I’m sorry but when a team gets as many “Too many men on the ice” penalties like we do, I have to give a resounding YES!! Renney can’t control his own bench, let alone institue any short of strategy.

  272. Dinochka

    NO!

Leave a Reply

Advertisement
About this blog
Rick Carpiniello leads the Journal News team in covering the Rangers and the world of hockey.
Subscribe

Get blog updates via email:

About the authors
Rick CarpinielloRick Carpiniello grew up in Harrison and began working in The Journal News' sports department (back when it was The Reporter Dispatch and eight other newspapers) in October of 1977 after a year of covering high school sports as a stringer. For more than 20 years he covered the New York Rangers and the National Hockey League. Carpiniello has been writing columns on everything from local sports to the big leagues since 2002. READ MORE
Josh ThomsonJosh Thomson Josh, who is 26 and a native of Carmel, graduated from Boston University in 2002 and began working for The Journal News the following March.
Rangers Poll
How would you describe the first quarter of the Rangers season?
View Results


Other recent entries

Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives

Bad Behavior has blocked 2734 access attempts in the last 7 days.