<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new look&#8230;again (Updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/</link>
	<description>News and insight about the New York Rangers by Rick Carpiniello</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: poker</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/#comment-355880</link>
		<dc:creator>poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2137#comment-355880</guid>
		<description>Very helpful info. Thanks, I look forward to reading more of your posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very helpful info. Thanks, I look forward to reading more of your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wd40</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/#comment-115895</link>
		<dc:creator>wd40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2137#comment-115895</guid>
		<description>new post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the HECK</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/#comment-115893</link>
		<dc:creator>What the HECK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2137#comment-115893</guid>
		<description>Joe in DE,
Comparative Verterbrate Anatomy and College Algebra.  And thats why I&#039;m getting off now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe in DE,<br />
Comparative Verterbrate Anatomy and College Algebra.  And thats why I&#8217;m getting off now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe in DE</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/#comment-115892</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe in DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2137#comment-115892</guid>
		<description>ChrisS, I&#039;m a 2L at Widener Law, Property II exam tomorrow night.  I&#039;m sorry that I wasted 3 hours watching this crap tonight that I could have spent studying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChrisS, I&#8217;m a 2L at Widener Law, Property II exam tomorrow night.  I&#8217;m sorry that I wasted 3 hours watching this crap tonight that I could have spent studying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the HECK</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/#comment-115891</link>
		<dc:creator>What the HECK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2137#comment-115891</guid>
		<description>ChrisS, 
Thats why I&#039;m on here.  I need to get away from Finals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChrisS, <br />
Thats why I&#8217;m on here.  I need to get away from Finals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the HECK</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/#comment-115890</link>
		<dc:creator>What the HECK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2137#comment-115890</guid>
		<description>West Canadian,
That is why I put down our stats next to it.  It also shows the our offense is really terrible thus far.  I did not count any shootout goals and those stats are what NHL says straight up.  Hank has been an upset the past couple games to say the least, I want our superstar goaltender back.  He obviously could not have won this game for us because we didn&#039;t score...but his save percentage is getting worse and worse right now, maybe Renney should give him a day off.  I&#039;m not saying Hank is the whole reason, but he does need to get out of this stretch soon, hopefully once the offense starts helping him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>West Canadian,<br />
That is why I put down our stats next to it.  It also shows the our offense is really terrible thus far.  I did not count any shootout goals and those stats are what NHL says straight up.  Hank has been an upset the past couple games to say the least, I want our superstar goaltender back.  He obviously could not have won this game for us because we didn&#8217;t score&#8230;but his save percentage is getting worse and worse right now, maybe Renney should give him a day off.  I&#8217;m not saying Hank is the whole reason, but he does need to get out of this stretch soon, hopefully once the offense starts helping him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe in DE</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/#comment-115888</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe in DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2137#comment-115888</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a question of &quot;finishers&quot;.  These are ALL NHL professionals.  They&#039;re all finishers in their own right.  Hell, look at what Malik could do given a clean break away.  The NYRs have had nothing but finshers: Jagr, Shanahan, Drury, Naslund...the list goes on and on.  The problem is the system. I see no coincidence that high scoring players come to NY and stop scoring, and young players have their development thwarted.  This team has 0 creativity, they&#039;re slow to move the puck, and after spending over 12 million on defensemen this offseason, we still don&#039;t have a good point man.  Our PP is still atrocious, and we&#039;re dead last in the league in home scoring.  Most of these issues can be addressed with coaching and practice.  It&#039;s almost like our team needs to get back to the game that got it&#039;s players to the NHL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a question of &#8220;finishers&#8221;.  These are ALL NHL professionals.  They&#8217;re all finishers in their own right.  Hell, look at what Malik could do given a clean break away.  The NYRs have had nothing but finshers: Jagr, Shanahan, Drury, Naslund&#8230;the list goes on and on.  The problem is the system. I see no coincidence that high scoring players come to NY and stop scoring, and young players have their development thwarted.  This team has 0 creativity, they&#8217;re slow to move the puck, and after spending over 12 million on defensemen this offseason, we still don&#8217;t have a good point man.  Our PP is still atrocious, and we&#8217;re dead last in the league in home scoring.  Most of these issues can be addressed with coaching and practice.  It&#8217;s almost like our team needs to get back to the game that got it&#8217;s players to the NHL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/#comment-115887</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2137#comment-115887</guid>
		<description>our team is done for a long time. we are going to waste the best years of lundqvist. Gomez for 6 more years at a ridiculous contract, same with drury who shows up one out of every 7 games. did anyone notice him on the ice tonight? did he play? then throw in rozival and redden and our team is done.  when Messier said he wanted to take over at GM, he could have saved this team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>our team is done for a long time. we are going to waste the best years of lundqvist. Gomez for 6 more years at a ridiculous contract, same with drury who shows up one out of every 7 games. did anyone notice him on the ice tonight? did he play? then throw in rozival and redden and our team is done.  when Messier said he wanted to take over at GM, he could have saved this team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisS</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/#comment-115886</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2137#comment-115886</guid>
		<description>Three more years of drury!
Five more years of Gomez! 


:)

Not productive, I know, but a harsh reality.. Everyone have a good night- anyone in college, enjoy those finals.. They&#039;re fucking killing me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three more years of drury!<br />
Five more years of Gomez! </p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>Not productive, I know, but a harsh reality.. Everyone have a good night- anyone in college, enjoy those finals.. They&#8217;re fucking killing me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: West Canadian Survivor</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2008/12/07/a-new-lookagain/#comment-115885</link>
		<dc:creator>West Canadian Survivor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/?p=2137#comment-115885</guid>
		<description>Two things:
a) We&#039;d most likely be 0-29 without Hank
b) Yeah sure, Hank has had a couple of non-Hank performances of late, but how would we win any way when we get shutout? Last time I checked, we need to score to actually have a chance of winning. To even consider pinning any part of the blame on Hank is ludicrous. It would only make sense if we were scoring 3 goals per game. Instead of finding ridiculously inane statistics such as opponent shooting percentage, why don&#039;t you tabulate how many games in which we have scored 3+ goals and I&#039;m not counting shootout goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things:<br />
a) We&#8217;d most likely be 0-29 without Hank<br />
b) Yeah sure, Hank has had a couple of non-Hank performances of late, but how would we win any way when we get shutout? Last time I checked, we need to score to actually have a chance of winning. To even consider pinning any part of the blame on Hank is ludicrous. It would only make sense if we were scoring 3 goals per game. Instead of finding ridiculously inane statistics such as opponent shooting percentage, why don&#8217;t you tabulate how many games in which we have scored 3+ goals and I&#8217;m not counting shootout goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

