Comments on: Where would the Rangers be without shootouts?

By: Rucchin

Rucchin — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:53:02 +0000

The shootout is good merely because ties were an awful part of the game.

By: LI Joe

LI Joe — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:14:18 +0000

ogerp – good post especially the last idea. 3 pts for reg win vs 2 for ot or shootout wins would have teams go for it more in regulation. and make each game worth 3 pts

By: New Newman

New Newman — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:01:52 +0000

Dude 1994 been watching Happy Gilmour too many times…

By: Dude1994

Dude1994 — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:54:33 +0000

LOL, yeah

I really didn’t mean that in the literal sense.

By: 22figure8

22figure8 — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:48:03 +0000

Dude, you eat up guys for breakfast?

By: Kaspar

Kaspar — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:28:04 +0000

Darren McCarty on waivers…Shanny to wingzzzzz??

By: sindydives

sindydives — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:27:43 +0000

What are the lines when gomez comes back?

By: Dude1994

Dude1994 — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:16:02 +0000

yeah, ok, LOL

You are the one who resorts to personal attacks when you have nothing left to say, but I am the troll.

That’s friggin classic my brutha!

By: Salty

Salty — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:14:48 +0000

For the time being, let’s get back to Ruutu while dude94 thinks up his next gem…

It seemed like Dubinsky wanted to go at it all game with Ruutu, but do you think Colton (or another) steps in instead just to “make sure” things are taken care of? I expect some juicy fireworks none the less…

By: Kaspar

Kaspar — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:11:57 +0000

” I’ve eaten up guys like you on these blogs for breakfast waaaaaaaaaay to long my friend”

Try getting some fiber