“So you’re saying Renney should’ve doubled Jagr’s shift” says what it says very clearly and is what it is——- you believed that I was calling for Renney to extend Jagr’s shift at the time the icing call was made. Why? Because you had no idea what the term “doubleshifting” meant when I raised it. The more you wriggle, you more you look silly.

As to the penalty shot? Read what Renney said in Sam’s new entry: “It has to be a trip, hook, cross-check, whatever,” Renney said. “It doesn’t say that in the rulebook at all.”

Not a fan of his bench skills, but I think that sums it up pretty well.

i’ve already booked my flight, hotel, etc…

i’m going regardless but would like to have tickets. help would be appreciated.

That wasn’t even the point I was making, I was only showing that Jagr couldn’t be double shifted because he was already on the ice…hence the question mark.

You’re also still wrong about the penalty shot. It’s not equivalent to a minor or major penalty and, hence, recorded differently.

But when that happened, it wasn’t called doubleshifting. It was called staying out on the ice, ie. moving from the forward line on a PP to manning the point on the same or extended PP.