<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hutchinson on waivers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/</link>
	<description>News and insight about the New York Rangers by Rick Carpiniello</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52095</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52095</guid>
		<description>Plus with Dawes, Jagr and Gomez already said they thought they needed another defensive presence on that line instead of Dawes.

I also think Dawes&#039;s ship has sailed for the time being, maybe a call-up later in the season.  But for now I think its safe to say Dawes should be going back to Hartford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus with Dawes, Jagr and Gomez already said they thought they needed another defensive presence on that line instead of Dawes.</p>
<p>I also think Dawes&#8217;s ship has sailed for the time being, maybe a call-up later in the season.  But for now I think its safe to say Dawes should be going back to Hartford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salted</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52094</link>
		<dc:creator>Salted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52094</guid>
		<description>still though...I think Dawes has missed his opportunity. I&#039;d personally rather put him in down for a while again while we see if Dubinsky can play NHL. 

It also irks me that this guy &quot;has to play with great players to play well&quot; WTF is that about? whatever happened to *earning* the opportunity to play with good players by separating yourself from the rest. Sure, I understand what it means and how/why it works, but still...Dawes has shown nothing, even with 1st line minutes with Jagr and Gomez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still though&#8230;I think Dawes has missed his opportunity. I&#8217;d personally rather put him in down for a while again while we see if Dubinsky can play NHL. </p>
<p>It also irks me that this guy &#8220;has to play with great players to play well&#8221; WTF is that about? whatever happened to <strong>earning</strong> the opportunity to play with good players by separating yourself from the rest. Sure, I understand what it means and how/why it works, but still&#8230;Dawes has shown nothing, even with 1st line minutes with Jagr and Gomez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salted</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52093</link>
		<dc:creator>Salted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52093</guid>
		<description>interesting, Nasty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting, Nasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasty1</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52092</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasty1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52092</guid>
		<description>Dawes Drury Jagr
Prucha Gomez Shannahan
Callahan Straka Avery
Hollweg Betts Orr/Hossa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawes Drury Jagr<br />
Prucha Gomez Shannahan<br />
Callahan Straka Avery<br />
Hollweg Betts Orr/Hossa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52091</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52091</guid>
		<description>Dawes is pointless on the 4ht line, if he isn&#039;t on the top 3 lines he won&#039;t b here.

There isn&#039;t enough scoring on your second line of Prucha-Gomez-Avery which is why Shanahan has to be on it.  I would love to see the Prucha-Straka-Callahan line together, the only problem is that line would get owned physically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawes is pointless on the 4ht line, if he isn&#8217;t on the top 3 lines he won&#8217;t b here.</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t enough scoring on your second line of Prucha-Gomez-Avery which is why Shanahan has to be on it.  I would love to see the Prucha-Straka-Callahan line together, the only problem is that line would get owned physically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasty1</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52090</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasty1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52090</guid>
		<description>I was just thinking, and I am not sure if they even tried this in the pre season or in camp, but why not give the line of Prucha Gomez Jagr a shot.  I think the speedy winger in Prucha would be a great fit with Gomez.  Maybe a line of 
Prucha Gomez Avery would be a good line as well.  Gomez does not HAVE to skate with Jagr and Drury does not HAVE to skate with Shannahan.  Renney didn&#039;t try enough combos in camp or the pre season.

Hossa Drury Jagr
Prucha Gomez Avery
Callahan Straka Shannahan
Hollweg Betts Orr/Dawes

Nothing wrong with skating shannahan on the third line and giving him a lot of powerplay time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just thinking, and I am not sure if they even tried this in the pre season or in camp, but why not give the line of Prucha Gomez Jagr a shot.  I think the speedy winger in Prucha would be a great fit with Gomez.  Maybe a line of <br />
Prucha Gomez Avery would be a good line as well.  Gomez does not HAVE to skate with Jagr and Drury does not HAVE to skate with Shannahan.  Renney didn&#8217;t try enough combos in camp or the pre season.</p>
<p>Hossa Drury Jagr<br />
Prucha Gomez Avery<br />
Callahan Straka Shannahan<br />
Hollweg Betts Orr/Dawes</p>
<p>Nothing wrong with skating shannahan on the third line and giving him a lot of powerplay time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beamer</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52089</link>
		<dc:creator>Beamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52089</guid>
		<description>Fritz is the next Avery?

He&#039;s annoying, sure. But does he have any other comparison? He&#039;s significantly bigger. He&#039;s significantly less skilled. He&#039;s a significantly better fighter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fritz is the next Avery?</p>
<p>He&#8217;s annoying, sure. But does he have any other comparison? He&#8217;s significantly bigger. He&#8217;s significantly less skilled. He&#8217;s a significantly better fighter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imagination</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52087</link>
		<dc:creator>imagination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52087</guid>
		<description>Sam &quot;..After nearly two weeks of assessing prospects and carrying a bloated roster for both practices and games,...&quot;  My question is why? Renney &amp; Sather know there are only a few spots open and only a few players they were really considering. Yesterday was the first day of camp in too many ways. The goal was to get Drury &amp; Gomez to develop chemistry &amp; to figure out lines. Renney needs to go back to before preseason game lines. Starting with Straka, Callihan, &amp; Prucha who was scoring everyday. Separating facts from hype is becoming a chore. The first reports were Jagr &amp; Gomez clicked, now it&#039;s Jagr &amp; Drury to try. It&#039;s time for Sather to figure out his roster &amp; who he wants to try &amp; trade. And what spots he&#039;s looking to fill. I would think it&#039;s still a D man &amp; a center with  NHL experience. Dubinsky should be competing with Callihan, Straka, &amp; Avery for the 3rd line center job. That really hasn&#039;t happened so far. Handing a spot to Dubinsky is not the wisest of moves. Staal would be better served to go to Hartford.  Mara, Pock &amp; Dawes are trade bait. That&#039;s why I think he should keep Pock &amp; Dawes up. If he can move Mara&#039;s salary, his cap situation would have some breathing room. After 10 games he can decide if he wants to bring Dubinsky &amp; Staal up. What Renney wants isn&#039;t necessarily what Sather will do. That&#039;s why I don&#039;t get  Zipay, &amp; Dellapina declaring Dubinsky &amp; Staal to make the roster. I assume those are opinions rather than Sather&#039;s declarations. It seems like the guys above Renney have a self &amp; Sather  imposed gag rule. It&#039;s time to try &amp; corner Sather.GOOD LUCK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam &#8221;..After nearly two weeks of assessing prospects and carrying a bloated roster for both practices and games,...&#8221;  My question is why? Renney &#038; Sather know there are only a few spots open and only a few players they were really considering. Yesterday was the first day of camp in too many ways. The goal was to get Drury &#038; Gomez to develop chemistry &#038; to figure out lines. Renney needs to go back to before preseason game lines. Starting with Straka, Callihan, &#038; Prucha who was scoring everyday. Separating facts from hype is becoming a chore. The first reports were Jagr &#038; Gomez clicked, now it&#8217;s Jagr &#038; Drury to try. It&#8217;s time for Sather to figure out his roster &#038; who he wants to try &#038; trade. And what spots he&#8217;s looking to fill. I would think it&#8217;s still a D man &#038; a center with  NHL experience. Dubinsky should be competing with Callihan, Straka, &#038; Avery for the 3rd line center job. That really hasn&#8217;t happened so far. Handing a spot to Dubinsky is not the wisest of moves. Staal would be better served to go to Hartford.  Mara, Pock &#038; Dawes are trade bait. That&#8217;s why I think he should keep Pock &#038; Dawes up. If he can move Mara&#8217;s salary, his cap situation would have some breathing room. After 10 games he can decide if he wants to bring Dubinsky &#038; Staal up. What Renney wants isn&#8217;t necessarily what Sather will do. That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t get  Zipay, &#038; Dellapina declaring Dubinsky &#038; Staal to make the roster. I assume those are opinions rather than Sather&#8217;s declarations. It seems like the guys above Renney have a self &#038; Sather  imposed gag rule. It&#8217;s time to try &#038; corner Sather.GOOD LUCK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52086</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52086</guid>
		<description>He was horrible, Please tell me he was just having a bad camp, because he is nothing but a minor league player.  So many people were able to just blow right by him and have a good scoring attempt.  

Dawes will be fine, he just has to find his groove on the NHL Ready.  His size hurts him a little, but I could see him being a 2nd or a 3rd line player easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He was horrible, Please tell me he was just having a bad camp, because he is nothing but a minor league player.  So many people were able to just blow right by him and have a good scoring attempt.  </p>
<p>Dawes will be fine, he just has to find his groove on the NHL Ready.  His size hurts him a little, but I could see him being a 2nd or a 3rd line player easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeA</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52078</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/09/26/hutchinson-on-waivers/#comment-52078</guid>
		<description>i wouldn&#039;t give up on Dawes yet, he&#039;s only gonna be 23 late in the season.  It took Martin St. Louis till he was 27 to start turning it on.  The Rangers really are set at goalie and D right now (yes i know they can use another banger but they have those assets in the minors). Hold onto Dawes until next year and see how he progresses, if he&#039;s getting shipped, package him for something great, not a trade deadline ripoff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wouldn&#8217;t give up on Dawes yet, he&#8217;s only gonna be 23 late in the season.  It took Martin St. Louis till he was 27 to start turning it on.  The Rangers really are set at goalie and D right now (yes i know they can use another banger but they have those assets in the minors). Hold onto Dawes until next year and see how he progresses, if he&#8217;s getting shipped, package him for something great, not a trade deadline ripoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

