<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rozsival may be back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/</link>
	<description>News and insight about the New York Rangers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:15:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Giatas</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/comment-page-2/#comment-61216</link>
		<dc:creator>Giatas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/#comment-61216</guid>
		<description>Cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolaon</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/comment-page-1/#comment-57941</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolaon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/#comment-57941</guid>
		<description>Nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/comment-page-1/#comment-41227</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/#comment-41227</guid>
		<description>Nice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LI Joe</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/comment-page-1/#comment-35198</link>
		<dc:creator>LI Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/#comment-35198</guid>
		<description>we did not lose because Hollweg played 5 minutes instead of Orr. Buffalo is too quick for Orr. If Rozy plays - as someone else said - it would be a good idea to dress 7 dmen and use Pock as a forward. If not Pock should play instead of Rachunek. Re the last forward it has to be Hollweg or Isbister. The 3rd line has to play more but to do it the Rangers have to stay out of the box.

BTW no Ranger fan refers to our team as rags. That&#039;s like an Islander fan calling his team fishsticks. 

LET&#039;S GO RANGERS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we did not lose because Hollweg played 5 minutes instead of Orr. Buffalo is too quick for Orr. If Rozy plays &#8211; as someone else said &#8211; it would be a good idea to dress 7 dmen and use Pock as a forward. If not Pock should play instead of Rachunek. Re the last forward it has to be Hollweg or Isbister. The 3rd line has to play more but to do it the Rangers have to stay out of the box.</p>
<p>BTW no Ranger fan refers to our team as rags. That&#8217;s like an Islander fan calling his team fishsticks. </p>
<p>LET&#8217;S GO RANGERS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Newman</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/comment-page-1/#comment-35196</link>
		<dc:creator>New Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/#comment-35196</guid>
		<description>After getting some more time to gather thoughts and whatnot...

Orr for Hollweg....I don&#039;t like it.  Ruff is not putting Peters in the lineup.  Hollweg is quicker and more physical.  He does take stupid penalties though. But so does Orr. This sounds nuts, but we might even take a shot at bringing Dubinsky up.....Thoughts anyone?

Avery&#039;s pre-series talk would have been effective if he had played well.  He did not though.  So people will be saying, &quot;Avery&#039;s talk backfired and worked to the Sabres advantage.&quot;  Avery was -3 last night and took two stupid penalties.  He was his own worst enemy last night.  Someone said it somewhere and I agree....right now as Avery goes, the team goes.  He needs to be smarter and quicker and more aggressive.  I love the guy for what he brings, but he needs to stay within himself.  Why would he be grabbing that guy in the offensive zone?  Not smart.

I think we still can play with these guys.  We just cannot run around without discipline.

The last thing is that we need to get in front of Miller and shoot from the slot, not from outside the faceoff circles.  Those are easy shots for him to stop.  Straka took it to the net hard last night and we got a goal.  Jags took it to the net hard and Hossa made a nice flip to the glove side but Miller bested him.

We need to get a lead on these guys and play smart.

Let&#039;s go boys....so we are down 1-0, BFD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After getting some more time to gather thoughts and whatnot&#8230;</p>
<p>Orr for Hollweg&#8230;.I don&#8217;t like it.  Ruff is not putting Peters in the lineup.  Hollweg is quicker and more physical.  He does take stupid penalties though. But so does Orr. This sounds nuts, but we might even take a shot at bringing Dubinsky up&#8230;..Thoughts anyone?</p>
<p>Avery&#8217;s pre-series talk would have been effective if he had played well.  He did not though.  So people will be saying, &#8220;Avery&#8217;s talk backfired and worked to the Sabres advantage.&#8221;  Avery was -3 last night and took two stupid penalties.  He was his own worst enemy last night.  Someone said it somewhere and I agree&#8230;.right now as Avery goes, the team goes.  He needs to be smarter and quicker and more aggressive.  I love the guy for what he brings, but he needs to stay within himself.  Why would he be grabbing that guy in the offensive zone?  Not smart.</p>
<p>I think we still can play with these guys.  We just cannot run around without discipline.</p>
<p>The last thing is that we need to get in front of Miller and shoot from the slot, not from outside the faceoff circles.  Those are easy shots for him to stop.  Straka took it to the net hard last night and we got a goal.  Jags took it to the net hard and Hossa made a nice flip to the glove side but Miller bested him.</p>
<p>We need to get a lead on these guys and play smart.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go boys&#8230;.so we are down 1-0, BFD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark the Realist</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/comment-page-1/#comment-35176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark the Realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/#comment-35176</guid>
		<description>&quot;If Orr plays two things happen. One Ruff may dress Peters meaning someone better sits. Or he doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t, but then that fourth line with Mair and Kotalik has something to think about besides just waltzing around like they owned the place. Orr has been out against the best lines in the league for a long time now and hasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t hurt the team.&quot;

Again, some realism PLEASE! Pigs will fly when Ruff decides to put Peters in, least of all in response to Orr suiting up. Who would he sit? Mair? He has been a stud in the playoffs. Kotalik? After last night&#039;s game?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Orr plays two things happen. One Ruff may dress Peters meaning someone better sits. Or he doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t, but then that fourth line with Mair and Kotalik has something to think about besides just waltzing around like they owned the place. Orr has been out against the best lines in the league for a long time now and hasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t hurt the team.&#8221;</p>
<p>Again, some realism PLEASE! Pigs will fly when Ruff decides to put Peters in, least of all in response to Orr suiting up. Who would he sit? Mair? He has been a stud in the playoffs. Kotalik? After last night&#8217;s game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/comment-page-1/#comment-35175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/#comment-35175</guid>
		<description>Agree with all the comments above.  It wouldve been nice to win Game 1, but its not the end of the world.  I think Racoon does need to not play because honestly, if hes not 100% hes a waste.  You need to have some physicality from every defenseman and to me, he looked like he was shying away from contact completely.  Plus he tooks too many chances.  Put Pock back in.  Same with Orr.  Truthfully, Hollweg brings nothing more than Orr and Orr is much much bigger.  And hey, he has scored more goals than hollywood this year...

I do think we are setting ourselves up for next year when we really make a run with guys like Staal in the lineup, and hopefully a real 2nd line center (Lang wouldnt be so bad playing with Avery and Shanny although I dont know what they would do with Straka).

Anything from the first round on is just icing on the cake.  I am more excited about next year than this one.  Its safe to say that the execs learned what works in this league and what doesnt, based on last year and this years early mistakes (i.e., Moore for Hall, signing slow old dmen, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with all the comments above.  It wouldve been nice to win Game 1, but its not the end of the world.  I think Racoon does need to not play because honestly, if hes not 100% hes a waste.  You need to have some physicality from every defenseman and to me, he looked like he was shying away from contact completely.  Plus he tooks too many chances.  Put Pock back in.  Same with Orr.  Truthfully, Hollweg brings nothing more than Orr and Orr is much much bigger.  And hey, he has scored more goals than hollywood this year&#8230;</p>
<p>I do think we are setting ourselves up for next year when we really make a run with guys like Staal in the lineup, and hopefully a real 2nd line center (Lang wouldnt be so bad playing with Avery and Shanny although I dont know what they would do with Straka).</p>
<p>Anything from the first round on is just icing on the cake.  I am more excited about next year than this one.  Its safe to say that the execs learned what works in this league and what doesnt, based on last year and this years early mistakes (i.e., Moore for Hall, signing slow old dmen, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Newman</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/comment-page-1/#comment-35174</link>
		<dc:creator>New Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/#comment-35174</guid>
		<description>I wrote most of this on another blog this AM, I am just too busy to create an original right now.

The real issue is not the refs or Buffalo, but it&#039;s dealing with the lackluster performance last night by the Blueshirts.

A few tidbits:

1) Shanny, despite his goal (too little too late,) was -4 on the night. That is unacceptable. Like how can Shanny be happy with his 5 on 3 play where he whistled 2 shots wide? In 5 on 3 play, you are not really supposed to take slappers from the point. You are supposed to get it down low and take shots from 15 feet. His linemates were not much better...Avery -3 and Straka -2 is just BS. That line started slow versus Atlanta, so there is huge room for improvement there. But if we are going to play competitively with Buffalo, that line has to do more. I am guessing they will rebound in game #2.

2) Rachunek was not ready. It&#039;s easy to be Monday AM QB, but Pock should have played, not Rachunek. (I know I was saying Rachy was a good choice before the game yesterday, but I was wrong. It happens!) He was a step slow on the blueline early and got caught pinching in the neutral zone on Vanek&#039;s 2nd goal. I hope Roszival&#039;s knee is actually &quot;mild&quot; like they claim.

3) Reluctantly, give some props to Miller, he played well.  Henry played very well too.  But he can only do so much.

4) They can&#039;t give up 8 powerplays. It just keeps Jags and Nyls off the ice and is too much wear and tear on the D to have them chasing for 16 mins of a 60 min game. Avery and Cullen with stupid offensive zone penalties. Then Avery with another in the D zone AFTER he had taken that guy off the puck already. Malik with a stupid closing the hand on the puck. Straka failed to clear the puck and then had to hook the guy. Too many stupid penalties. I think they were rusty from the days off.

5) To continue on that last line, they were a step slow given the huge days of rest. If Jags had buried that chance 30 secs into the game, it would have been an entirely different story.  I think after practicing for 7 days and then being given that chance in the first rush it was apparent that he was a little rusty.

6) The best line on the ice for the Rangers throughout the night was Cally-Cullen-Prucha. Callahan was hitting everything, going to the net, taking shots (Ranger high of 5, btw), and being scrappy. Nice job. Cullen took a dumb penalty, but played hard overall. I just wish Jags-Nyls-Hossa had played more consistently throughout.

The bottom line, they cannot make little mistakes against Buffalo or they are dead. They were a step slow in most places, thus they could not hit them as much as they probably wanted to. But they have to hit them when they can, like on the forecheck, and then stay composed when backchecking and playing in the D zone.

We did not expect to sweep Buffalo, so it&#039;s OK. Game 2  just becomes that much more important now. I like the way we played for the first 20 mins and even into the 2nd. But the penalties we took were bad. Could the refs have called a little more on the Sabres, yes maybe. Still though, the Rangers took some dumb, lazy penalties.

Onwards....focus on game #2. LGR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote most of this on another blog this AM, I am just too busy to create an original right now.</p>
<p>The real issue is not the refs or Buffalo, but it&#8217;s dealing with the lackluster performance last night by the Blueshirts.</p>
<p>A few tidbits:</p>
<p>1) Shanny, despite his goal (too little too late,) was -4 on the night. That is unacceptable. Like how can Shanny be happy with his 5 on 3 play where he whistled 2 shots wide? In 5 on 3 play, you are not really supposed to take slappers from the point. You are supposed to get it down low and take shots from 15 feet. His linemates were not much better&#8230;Avery -3 and Straka -2 is just BS. That line started slow versus Atlanta, so there is huge room for improvement there. But if we are going to play competitively with Buffalo, that line has to do more. I am guessing they will rebound in game #2.</p>
<p>2) Rachunek was not ready. It&#8217;s easy to be Monday AM QB, but Pock should have played, not Rachunek. (I know I was saying Rachy was a good choice before the game yesterday, but I was wrong. It happens!) He was a step slow on the blueline early and got caught pinching in the neutral zone on Vanek&#8217;s 2nd goal. I hope Roszival&#8217;s knee is actually &#8220;mild&#8221; like they claim.</p>
<p>3) Reluctantly, give some props to Miller, he played well.  Henry played very well too.  But he can only do so much.</p>
<p>4) They can&#8217;t give up 8 powerplays. It just keeps Jags and Nyls off the ice and is too much wear and tear on the D to have them chasing for 16 mins of a 60 min game. Avery and Cullen with stupid offensive zone penalties. Then Avery with another in the D zone AFTER he had taken that guy off the puck already. Malik with a stupid closing the hand on the puck. Straka failed to clear the puck and then had to hook the guy. Too many stupid penalties. I think they were rusty from the days off.</p>
<p>5) To continue on that last line, they were a step slow given the huge days of rest. If Jags had buried that chance 30 secs into the game, it would have been an entirely different story.  I think after practicing for 7 days and then being given that chance in the first rush it was apparent that he was a little rusty.</p>
<p>6) The best line on the ice for the Rangers throughout the night was Cally-Cullen-Prucha. Callahan was hitting everything, going to the net, taking shots (Ranger high of 5, btw), and being scrappy. Nice job. Cullen took a dumb penalty, but played hard overall. I just wish Jags-Nyls-Hossa had played more consistently throughout.</p>
<p>The bottom line, they cannot make little mistakes against Buffalo or they are dead. They were a step slow in most places, thus they could not hit them as much as they probably wanted to. But they have to hit them when they can, like on the forecheck, and then stay composed when backchecking and playing in the D zone.</p>
<p>We did not expect to sweep Buffalo, so it&#8217;s OK. Game 2  just becomes that much more important now. I like the way we played for the first 20 mins and even into the 2nd. But the penalties we took were bad. Could the refs have called a little more on the Sabres, yes maybe. Still though, the Rangers took some dumb, lazy penalties.</p>
<p>Onwards&#8230;.focus on game #2. LGR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salty Wound Licker</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/comment-page-1/#comment-35173</link>
		<dc:creator>Salty Wound Licker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/#comment-35173</guid>
		<description>Buffalo.....damn. 

Few little things I noticed:

-In the pregame, I forget the sabre that was being interviewed on the ice, but the second Avery&#039;s name was mentioned he looked away and spat almost subconsciously. I do believe Avery nullified himself by saying what he did....theyre only using it to thier advantage.

-Rags obviously looked great first 10 mins and it slipped away after the penalties started....I&#039;m not sure what to make of that....was it flow or was it fatigue....?

-I thought Rachunek *did* make a couple of good plays.

-Someone said something about Shanny *not* thinking there was a discipline problem....but it appeared to me he was scolding/yelling at Hollweg for his late penalty...

-Connoly&#039;s behind the back move was sick...I&#039;m really glad he didn&#039;t put that away.

-Lundqvist is absurd but he can only do so much.

Not really sure what to make of it right now....I guess we&#039;ll have to see how these guys handle this....but I will say that I think BUF made it look pretty easy to handle NYR last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buffalo&#8230;..damn. </p>
<p>Few little things I noticed:</p>
<p>-In the pregame, I forget the sabre that was being interviewed on the ice, but the second Avery&#8217;s name was mentioned he looked away and spat almost subconsciously. I do believe Avery nullified himself by saying what he did&#8230;.theyre only using it to thier advantage.</p>
<p>-Rags obviously looked great first 10 mins and it slipped away after the penalties started&#8230;.I&#8217;m not sure what to make of that&#8230;.was it flow or was it fatigue&#8230;.?</p>
<p>-I thought Rachunek <strong>did</strong> make a couple of good plays.</p>
<p>-Someone said something about Shanny <strong>not</strong> thinking there was a discipline problem&#8230;.but it appeared to me he was scolding/yelling at Hollweg for his late penalty&#8230;</p>
<p>-Connoly&#8217;s behind the back move was sick&#8230;I&#8217;m really glad he didn&#8217;t put that away.</p>
<p>-Lundqvist is absurd but he can only do so much.</p>
<p>Not really sure what to make of it right now&#8230;.I guess we&#8217;ll have to see how these guys handle this&#8230;.but I will say that I think BUF made it look pretty easy to handle NYR last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/comment-page-1/#comment-35171</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/04/25/rozsival-may-be-back/#comment-35171</guid>
		<description>did renney say anything after the game ie why the third line got so little ice time and why he stuck with that horrendous 5-3 grouping and why avery was on that power play in the first place. poorly played game and a poorly coached game. Rachunek didnt cost us the game but why was he in there in the first place. Pock was playing great but Renney needed to get one of his boys back in there. mara by the way looked terrible, why do u drop to your chest to block a shot when one of their best shooters is point blank. if mara stands up vanek he has no where to put that puck with either a shot or a pass.

agreed you can put that down as a bad game but you have to correct what went wrong and that was mainly the sloppy defensive play and the terrible play by the &quot;2nd&quot; line</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did renney say anything after the game ie why the third line got so little ice time and why he stuck with that horrendous 5-3 grouping and why avery was on that power play in the first place. poorly played game and a poorly coached game. Rachunek didnt cost us the game but why was he in there in the first place. Pock was playing great but Renney needed to get one of his boys back in there. mara by the way looked terrible, why do u drop to your chest to block a shot when one of their best shooters is point blank. if mara stands up vanek he has no where to put that puck with either a shot or a pass.</p>
<p>agreed you can put that down as a bad game but you have to correct what went wrong and that was mainly the sloppy defensive play and the terrible play by the &#8220;2nd&#8221; line</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
