To start today, a broad thank you to those of you who passed along your endorsement of the work on this site. As I said earlier, I don’t take any of that lightly.
But to be clear, the purpose of my previous entry was more to emphasize that dissent in this sort of forum is not only inevitable, but in many ways, encouraged. I’ve always said that the readers here have opened my eyes to things I normally wouldn’t see when it comes to this intriguing but ultimately maddening team. And as long as it’s done in a respectful manner, I have no problem with folks taking issue with what I write.
But enough about me. Let’s move on to a few odds and ends:
I think there might be something to that, but the irony is that Renney is also criticized for being too much of a player’s coach and not bringing the hammer enough. And yet another criticism has been that he doesn’t show enough emotion.
It’s a lot to think about. Of course, if he got players to shoot more on the power play, that’d probably help most of all.
OK, more later…